Skip to content

Five Medical Tourism Myths

April 12, 2011

In recent years, destination medical care using international hospitals and doctors emerged as a serious medical care alternative for men and women around the globe.  Unfortunately, destination medical care is often grouped with its less serious relative, which the media and many companies refer to as medical tourism.  As a result, there has not been a great deal of well written information about destination medical care as a serious discipline.  It’s time to dispel a few of the myths.

Myth 1:  Destination medical care is a new development.

Reality:  Americans make destination medical care decisions regularly.  In fact, it has become so commonplace in today’s society we do not even think of traveling for care when we need it as an issue.  What is new is that travel today makes it easy to reach international hospitals that once seemed too far away. 

Myth 2:  Destination medical care is only for the uninsured.

Reality:  Both insured and uninsured people stand to benefit from the access, affordability and quality of medical care associated with destination medical care.  Patients with high deductible health plans can realize significant savings.  Others with limited medical plans, sometimes called mini-meds, can stretch the amount of care that can be secured.  Patients can access care without extended wait times at hospitals delivering medical outcomes among the best in the world, regardless of whether they have insurance or not.   

Myth 3:  Destination medical care’s lower cost means low quality.

Reality:  The comparison is almost unfair, in large part, because US medical costs are among the most expensive anywhere in the world.  In contrast, where costs of living are much lower, hospital costs are subsidized by governments, and national insurance arrangements reduce the impact of unpaid medical bills, expenses for medical care are also much lower.  Premier hospitals spanning the globe offer exceptional medical care and attention. Michael. D. Horowitz, MD, MBA, a cardiothoracic surgeon who studies international medical care states, “It is naïve to think that just because someone practices elsewhere they are not as well-trained, qualified, or artistic as a physician in the United States.”  In fact, some international hospitals deliver long-term medical outcomes that meet and exceed those of America’s best hospitals.  The key is being able to find and access those providers.

Myth 4:  Destination medical care is a recreation or desperation choice.

Reality:  Both the American Medical Association and American College of Surgeons recognize the benefits of destination medical care.  It is not a medical vacation or a last resort effortThe American College of Surgeons described it by writing “Residents of the US may choose to pursue medical care abroad for a variety of reasons, including..lack of services available at home; limits imposed..on access to certain specialists, treatment protocols, equipment or services; prolonged waiting periods, lower costs of care and personal reasons.” 

Myth 5:  My doctor at home won’t provide follow-up care.

Reality:  We hear this myth repeated a lot, most of the time by people who understand very little about destination medical care.  Doctors treat patients who received care at other hospitals, including vacationers who received treatment abroad, on a regular basis.  Dr. Kevin Huffman, a bariatric surgeon, commented, “As doctors, we really don’t recognize or care that a patient received treatment from a qualified surgeon.  Our worries come when we have to clean up a surgery performed badly by a poor doctor.”  In our own research, we have not found a single physician who indicated he or she would refuse to treat a patient after learning about our proprietary credentialing process and arrangements to keep the home and destination doctors connected throughout a patient’s international care.

For more on the benefits of destination medical care, visit us at www.soterhealth.com or contact us at 855-54SOTER.

5 Comments leave one →
  1. Jason Figgins permalink
    April 14, 2011 11:43 AM

    Well put. Clearly, not every hospital in developing countries is great, but there are many in places people don’t think of that are on par with Europe’s and the United States’ best. I travel abroad often and now have much of my routine care performed there. It’s less expensive, I don’t have to wait for days and weeks to get an appointment, and my doctors are actually interested in what is happening with my aches and ills.

  2. G. Runnels permalink
    April 14, 2011 3:30 PM

    A very interesting take on medical travel. I wouldn’t have seen it as all that commonplace, but the way you describe it, it certainly is. I didn’t know the AMA approved of medical travel. It was a surprise to see this and then read their policy.

    Thanks for increasing at least my understanding.

  3. David Green permalink
    April 15, 2011 9:14 AM

    Dear Soter Healthcare,
    Interesting article.

    David B. Green
    Director of International Operations & Strategic Development
    Kaleida Health

  4. Hector Ojeda permalink
    April 15, 2011 10:42 AM

    Medical tourism is a reality in Latin America and Europe. For years, governments and travel insurance companies have had to keep an eye on this phenomenon. We have identified cases where British travelers sought treatment they could not get under their National Health System.

  5. April 18, 2011 2:55 AM

    It is somewhat surprising AMA approval of medical care in abroad, yet also promising for better quality healthcare to be accessible by patients and their relatives.

    Well, the important point is and always will be that patient centric approach which is well planned and orchestrated via multidisciplinary approach. Accreditation helps but not enough to assure the quality healthcare for sure.

    Understanding needs of the patients and well coordination pre- and post-treatment of patients is a must in medical tourism.

Leave a comment